Video games are full of sex

This game of scrabble that Dave and I played is definitely not appropriate for children.



Among our words, we have sex (porn, porno, spunk, and jo), drugs (meth, high, bar, zin, and laced), and once you give up on the sybaritic life, we have religion (god)

He just plays a normal guy on TV

Apparently, genial game show host Ben Stein is in reality a complete loon.

Another fallen TV hero. Who'd of thunk it that the wisecracking host of "Win Ben Stein's Money" is actually a right-wing nutcase. I knew he used to write speeches for Richard Nixon, but hey, who hasn't? Next thing you know, we'll learn that Big Bird actually is an ex-con who was put away for pecking kids' eyes out or something.

Obama-mania, catch it!

100% total full-frontal caucus action

Along with my friends Marc, Matt and about 2215 other Kansas Democrats, I piled into the Douglas County Fairgrounds last night for the Democratic caucus.

The night was spent mostly waiting in line to get into the arena, which was a huge dirt area used for livestock shows and such. I suspected a secret Republican plot; once they got all the Democrats in the arena, they would lock the gate and release the bulls! Luckily, nothing so dramatic happened, just a lot of talking, cheering and running into people we knew. The actual counting and speeches didn't take too long at all, and at the end of the night, the count was about 10-1 Obama over Hillary. It came close to being a complete sweep, but after the first round of counting, a few of the Edwards folks joined the Clinton section, which pusher her over the limit and got her a couple delegates. In the end, my district went 9-2 for Obama, and for the first time in the history of Kansas Presidential politics, my actual vote counted for something! It even made the muddy parking lot and the drive home in a snowstorm worth it.

Link Whore

Dave and I have a new column in the February issue of The Lawrencian. It's about gay people and computers. Well, specifically about Macs and PCs and gays and straights.

Go read it now.

That is all.

A Cable Conundrum (aka "The Digital Cable TV Primer")

Do you remember the old days? You could just get any old TV and buy it and once you got home, plug it in, hook the cable up from the wall, and you could enjoy dozens of channels of crap from the comfort of your own living room. Life has definitely changed, and spurred on by my local cable company's recent deletion of one of our favorite channels, I have gotten quite an education in the rapidly changing and incredibly complex new world of television. The key thing is, if you want to watch (and especially, record) the boob tube in 2008 and beyond, it takes some real work.

Like most halfway-tuned-in people, I knew that something vague was happening with TV in 2009, that all over-the-air television was going to change from analog (the system used for the past 60 years) into digital. However, I didn't think this really affected me, and in fact, it does not. I mean, who gets their TV over the air in 2008? Libertarians? Everyone I know either has cable or uses a dish.

We have cable, and so I didn't really care. My understanding was that cable TV wasn't affected by this whole analog-to-digital transition. Sure I eventually wanted a cool flat-panel TV set, but I figured I could wait a few years...it wasn't that important. I was happy with my old-fashioned analog cable.

Side note #1: "Digital TV" and "HDTV" are not the same thing. "Digital" refers to the type of signal that comes in over the antenna or cable line. "High definition" refers to the actual size and resolution of the display. You can have a digital signal without high definition, although the reverse is not true - all high definition TV is going to be digital.

Last month, the cable company dropped the Sci-Fi Channel from the cable lineup, quite rudely, without any warning, and of course, without lowering their rates. After some poking around, I discovered they didn't actually drop it, they simply moved its broadcast to digital-only. Furthermore, the Sci-Fi channel was only the first. In the year ahead, many additional channels were going to digital-only. According to the cable company, analog channels take up a lot of room; eliminating one analog channel allows several digital channels to take its place. Eventually, their goal is to broadcast a very limited selection of analog channels (mostly the big networks) and have everything else digital. Unlike their over-the-air brethren, the cable companies are not required by law to switch from analog to digital; rather they choose to do this of their own accord, mostly to gain increased room on their wires for new digital services.

Older TV sets cannot display digital cable by themselves. They need a special decoder box, rented from the cable company, in order to do this. Existing consumer recording devices fail with digital cable as well. This means any VCR or TiVo can't be used to record digital cable without very complex and clunky work-arounds. If you want to keep your existing TV and watch digital cable, your best bet is simply to rent a box from the cable company (and of course pay them extra for that privilege) and forget about using a VCR or TiVo. Cable companies also have their own mediocre TiVo-like DVRs that they will rent you as well, but they are generally of poor quality and are overpriced. Here, you, the consumer run into one of the most unpleasant realities of the new digital cable world: the freedom you used to enjoy of being able to buy TVs, VCRs, TiVos, tuner cards for computers, and so forth and just have them work, out of the box, without paying for anything other then basic cable service, is over....for now

This really sucks. Being forced to rent equipment from the cable company in order to watch even basic digital cable seems like some anti-competitive retrograde policy right out of the old "you have to rent your phone from Ma Bell" monopoly days from long, long ago. And it is. The good news is that the FCC recognizes this and so do most electronics manufacturers. These two parties are going to eventually force America's cable companies to adopt a common standard where you will eventually be able to once again buy any gadget and just have it work with digital cable without needing to rent equipment. The bad news is that these wonderful days are still a couple years away. In the mean time, if you want to enjoy digital cable, you have to rent equipment from your friendly local cable company.

This is true even if you have a brand-spanking new flat panel HDTV with a digital tuner and everything. That's because the digital tuner in your new TV will pick up over-the-air digital TV (the kind you need an antenna for). Some of these new TVs have what is known as a ClearQAM cable tuner as well, which in theory can be used to watch unencrypted digital cable, but for a variety of technical reasons, not really very well (most digital cable is encrypted by the cable company anyway, and the unencrypted digital cable often changes frequencies without warning, making it difficult to find a particular channel). The workaround for these troubles is, of course, the dreaded set-top box...or, a technology called cable cards.

New TiVos, and any decent new TV will support cable cards. These are essentially miniature set-top boxes, about the size of those PC cards that slide into laptop computers. Like set-top boxes, they let you view all digital cable content and you have to rent them from the cable company, but unlike set top boxes these cards slide into the back of the TV, meaning you have one less box to plug in and one less remote control to keep track of. Modern TiVos also use cable cards, which means that for TiVo addicts such as myself, there is a way to use TiVos with digital and HD cable.

There are a couple down sides to cable cards besides the annoying fact that you still have to rent them from the cable company. Cable cards do not support the "interactive" features (like video on demand) that some people want, and the actual installation of the cards can be very tricky. It's still not as easy as the old days of just plugging in a cable and watching TV. Once a cable card is inserted, you have to contact the cable company to "activate" it, and some cable companies insist on having one of their technicians come out to do the install.

Anyway, given the fact that I hate set-top boxes, yet want to watch digital cable, the cable card is the best we've got for right now, and is going to be the gateway to the triumphant return of Stargate Atlantis to my television set.

"Going to be" is the key phrase; Dave and I are currently in the middle of the relatively complex transition to the digital cable world. We've bought a new TiVo, but our new TV hasn't yet arrived (technically, we do not need a new TV, but if we have to update equipment, might as well make the jump to a flat screen and HD at the same time!). So, I can't tell you if everything will work out (ask me in two weeks). However, I have learned a lot, and hopefully this knowledge will be useful to others.

So, anyway, here's the Readers' Digest guide to making the move to digital cable....

1. First, make sure you even have to make the jump. Contact your cable company and ask their schedule for switching from analog to digital. If you are satisfied with your current TV and your cable company is going to keep broadcasting all their channels you watch in analog, then be happy and don't worry!

2. If they are going to make the switch, decide whether you need or want a cable set-top box or not. If you just watch TV without ever recording anything, or if your recording needs are very light, it probably just make sense to rent a DVR or set-top box from the cable company. You can do this whether you keep your existing TV or decide to buy a new flat panel TV. Honestly, most people probably can stop here. This is the easiest way to go, and is your only real choice if you don't want a new TV.

3. If your cable company is going digital, and you do not want a set-top box, or if you are a serious time-shifter (i.e. TiVo fanatic), then you will need to call the cable company and get cable cards. Cable companies are required by the FCC to provide these to subscribers, although they are allowed to charge for them. You will need a new TV (unless your existing set is a decent flat panel set from the past couple years - most of those already have cable card slots).

4. Turn on "American Idol" and decide that you really don't need TV after all.

Irony

I just purchased a book called Against the Machine, which is a short book-length essay with a very negative view towards the effect of the Internet on our culture.

Needless to say, I bought the book using Amazon.

Speaking of books, I just finished a very good work of fiction, a book by Dan Simmons called The Terror which is sort of a combination of historic fiction and horror with a touch of the fantastic and mythic. It concerns the lost British Franklin expedition of the 1840s which tried to find the Northwest Passage and ended up getting stuck in the polar ice for years on end. The Terror is amazing in the breadth it covers, everything from British naval life to Inuit (Eskimo) mythology, but at its heart it is a story of survival in brutal conditions and a story of transcendence and redemption in the face of unimaginable horror. It is long (over 700 pages) but is well worth the effort.

Ugh, Hillary

So Hillary Clinton narrowly won the New Hampshire primary. I just don't know what anyone sees in her. Are there really that many Democrats eager to vote for someone who automatically will enter the general election with a 10 point negative handicap versus anyone the Republicans decide to run against her?

What do people see in Hillary? She just strikes me as a a tired, old politician, the ultimate insider. She represents the worst of pandering, phony pseudo-liberal nanny-like outrage, and stale political ideas. I am sick of Bushes and Clintons. I am eager for the Bush years to be over, and the Clinton years should stay in memory a time of happy nostalgia for a period when the economy was booming, the world was at peace, and the Internet was a new frontier.

We can't have President Obama soon enough!

One laptop, poor child

Sting will not be able to save the rain forests, and Bono can't do shit for Africa, but nonetheless, idealists, no matter how earnest and annoying they can be, really have made this a better planet upon which to live. I admire the people behind the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) initiative, and believe that a program which has as its goal increasing the penetration of inexpensive and easy-to-use networkable computing power to those without access to such things is an unabashedly Good Thing.

Unfortunately, when the rubber hits the road, so to speak, OLPC falls on its face. Continuing the Western tradition of sending its garbage to the Third World, the OLPC can charitably be described as, well, not very good - a grossly underpowered computer with perhaps one of the worst user interfaces ever seen on a device meant to be used by ordinary people. The slowness of the device is not a deal-killer. If the choice is between a computer or no computer, waiting 15 seconds to switch between applications is not a big deal. And on a pure hardware level, the OLPC is an impressive thing for $200 -- with a rugged, water resistant case, wifi, a small but decent color display, innovative landscape and eBook modes, and even a video camera and microphone.

However, all this innovation is destroyed by the UI. There is no way around it. It is horrible - menu-based DOS systems had easier to understand interfaces. Nobody who has ever used a computer will be able to understand the UI, and I would wager that even those who have never touched a PC will be lost. A traditional windowing system was not used for the logical reason that the display was too small. I understand this. However, the alternative would seem to be big, colorful icons that are easily understandable. Instead, though, the main OLPC UI is a confusing collection of tiny abstract shapes, little X's and O's of various colors randomly strewn about across the screen. There's an application launch bar, but it is hidden in the default view. Even once you manage to launch an application, there's no obvious way to control it, no menus, icons, or anything. The OLPC comes with a lot of interesting applications, including various music, web surfing, painting, basic programming, and writing tools, all of which could be useful for children, but each one suffers from the same horrible basic UI that makes any kind of actual use nearly impossible.





Tell me, Dave, which one is the OLPC PC, and which one is Robotron 2084?

The operating system (and UI) are open source, but I do not think this is a problem; after all, Ubuntu Linux is open source and its collaborators have managed to create a beautiful and functional UI. Rather, I think the development of the interface was done ad-hoc, without any real-world testing, by people who operated under completely misguided perceptions of what makes a computer easy or hard to learn. And, because of this, the OLPC initiative now has a huge boat anchor wrapped around it, which will drag this project down, in spite of its innovative hardware and good intentions.

There's nothing that says a semi-charitable computer has to suck. It's a bit more expensive, but ASUS's eee PC addresses all of the OLPC's shortcomings, so it can be done. I think the OLPC folks have solved half the problem - they have designed a good piece of hardware; they just need to swallow their pride, and build a UI for the device that is useable by human beings, and then, perhaps, some of their goals might be within reach.

Update: Dave checks in with a great, detailed review of the OLPC unit.