Where we reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone |
|
|
Musings from Mike Silverman on subjects of interest ranging from politics to technology to culture to whatever else happens to be on my mind.
Blogs I Read
Kesher Talk
Classical Values Paul Drabek Aaron W. Benson Brian Tiemann Daring Fireball Cranky Chick World I Know Stephen Silver Tim Wilson Plucky Punk Right Side of the Rainbow Leah's Life Josh Klein Fablog Todd
Kansas blogs
Heretical Ideas Hairy Dog Brewery Johnny America Nels Matt Kappenman KC Bloggers Thoughts from Kansas Red State Rabble Evolution In This Moment
Statistics
Current number
0
of heterosexual marriages destroyed by legal same-sex marriage:
(automatically updated daily)
The blogger
Archives
|
Thursday, February 01, 2007
Conservatives are in favor of local control of government... ...Except when they're not. In a state where marriage is quite definitely "protected" from the depravations of loving gay couples thanks to a constitutional amendment approved by voters two years ago, it looks like even that isn't enough for a random state legislator, Lance Kinzer, who hails from Olathe, but somehow thinks he should be able to tell the citizens of Lawrence what kind of local ordinances they are allowed to pass. He has introduced a bill that would prohibit cities such as Lawrence from adopting any kind of domestic partner registries or programs. Lawrence, you might recall, was the only county in Kansas to vote against the marriage amendment, and it did so by an overwhelming margin. The city commissioners of Lawrence are planning on implementing a domestic partner registry. Although the reigstry cannot counter state law, and will be basically symbolic, it is an important statement that clearly reflects the will of the citizens of Lawrence. Representative Lance Kinzer has no right to tell Lawrence what ordinances it may adopt. Home rule is a fundamental building block of our system of government, and it basically means that cities are free to govern themselves and enact any ordinances they see fit so long as they do not violate state law. The legislature has the power to enforce uniform state law on any subject it wishes, but this power is to be used sparingly, on the principle that local control is the best. There is no matter of statewide concern here. Lawrence's registry doesn't force other cities to do anything, nor does it violate state law (unless a court or the Attorney General say otherwise; and there will certainly be a suit to determine this). The reason Lance Kinzer is trying to tell the people of Lawrence what to do is bigotry. He cannot abide by the thought that anywhere in this state there might be a city where gay people are actually thought by the majority of their neighbors to be fully human. The Kansas legislature is hardly a bastion of liberalism, but I doubt the leadership is spoiling for a "culture war" fight this year. Hopefully this disgusting bill will die alone in a committee, and the people of Lawrence -- and Olathe -- can make of their communities what they wish. Labels: gay rights, kansas, politics |